Thursday, 8 October 2015

                                       Buddha


നമുക്ക് വേണ്ടി കാവൽ തേടന്ന് പൂജാരിമാരില്ല, നമുക്ക് വേണ്ടി പ്രാർഥിക്കാൻ അമ്പലങ്ങളില്ല, നമ്മുടെ മനസ്സുകളെ പിടിച്ചു കുലുക്കുന്ന ഫിലോസഫികളൊ നേർവഴി പറയുന്ന പുസ്തകങ്ങളൊ ഇല്ല....
             പകരം നമ്മുടെ മനസാണ് നമ്മുടെ അമ്പലം, നമ്മുടെ പ്രവർത്തിയാണ് നമ്മുടെ ദൈവം , സഹജീവികളോട് കാണിക്കുന്ന വിനയവും സഹായവുമാണ് നമ്മുടെ പുസ്തകം.......
                                            .......... ബുദ്ധമതം .................

നമ്മുടെ  വിശ്വാസങ്ങളാണ് നമ്മുടെ ശരികൾ... ആരും ആരെയും മുറിവേൽപ്പിക്കാതിരിക്കുക, especially  അവരുടെ വിശ്വാസങ്ങളെ , ആ വിശ്വാസം നമ്മെ മുറിവേൽപ്പിക്കാത്ത കാലത്തോളം........ 

India is back in “Black Renaissance”

............................................................................................
 In India, the slaughter of cattle is allowed with restrictions (like a 'fit-for-slaughter' certificate which may be issued depending on factors like age and gender of cattle, continued economic viability, etc.), but only for bulls and buffaloes and not cows in fourteen states; it is completely banned in six states with pending litigation in the supreme court to overturn the ban; while there is no restriction in many states. This has created communal disharmony in India and frequently leads to unwanted incidents.
Gopastami, a holiday celebrated by the Hindus once a year, is one of the few instances where cows receive prayers and sacrifices in modern day India. While the cow is still respected and honored by most of the Indian population, there has been controversy over the treatment of the cows during the holiday. Part of the holiday includes sacrificing the cow to symbolize the continuation of life. Since cow slaughtering is only legal in two Indian states, cows must be transported around the country in rather poor conditions, usually train or by foot.This lack of sacredness toward the cows alarms many animal activists and some dedicated Hindus.

Indian society is actually in the path of renaissance (revival of the past). European renaissance was a glorified thing in history where Indian cultural revivalism is a black mark in the history of India.   Hindu oriented Modi government force people to go back to the Vedic times. The rigidness of caste practices and the caste based politics which make a rude stratification in the society are evidences for this. The cultural liberalism is declining and forcible religious rigidness with the aim of creating a ‘Hindurashtra’ is in its peak now. Narendra Modi’s image is like a pious believer who initiates bloody sacrifices to satisfy the blood thirst of his god, The Hindu majority who can Change, Preserve, and destroy his rule. The blood shedding incident took place in Dadri is an example for this. The fundamental question about the value of human life is raised but it is answered with the ‘great’ value of animal’s life....
                 


CHU
Haryana.

Wednesday, 7 October 2015

Is it okay to ban beef in a secular country like India on                                          religious grounds....?

Reasons why beef  should not be banned

                           A secular state is a concept of secularism , whereby a state or country purports to be officially neutral in matters ofreligion,
  1. By the very definition of secularism, the state cannot ban cow slaughter citing the reason to be: "Banned in Hinduism". The state has no right to ban cow slaughter simply because it is banned in Hinduism just like it has no right to ban idol worship simply because it's banned in Christianity/Islam. (Before you accuse me of pseudo-secularism, know that I support Uniform Civil Code as well)
  2. Coming to economic arguments, what is the economic benefit of keeping bulls or dried up cows? (If the cows are artificially inseminated and the fields are ploughed by machines, it is a burden on the farmer to feed bulls). The cows slaughtered for beef are not the milk-giving ones. India leads the world in beef export and it fetched India Rs.13725.23 crores in 2012. So in purely economic terms, it is an unsound decision to ban cow slaughter.
                
 3.   Now let's come to how the lifestyle of the people is affected.  The United Nations Food and Agriculture Organisation UN (FAO) report titled Livestock Information, Sector Analysis and Policy Branch says the largest consumed meat in India is beef (Note: meat does not include chicken) . The total consumption of beef in India per year is 26 lakh tonnes[1], as compared to 6 lakh tonnes of mutton and 14 lakh tonnes of pork. Given that this is the case, a nation-wide ban on cow slaughter will have a considerable effect on lifestyle and is an encroachment on the fundamental rights.


4.  If it's about animal rights, why be partial to cows? What about pork or mutton?











Contrasting views within Hinduism about cow slaughter

The verse in Hindu scripture which is said to ban cow slaughter is:
Rig Veda 10.87.16: “yaḥ pauruṣeyeṇa kraviṣā samaṅkte yo aśveyena paśunāyātudhānaḥ,yo aghnyāyā bharati kṣīramaghne teṣāṃśīrṣāṇi harasāpi vṛśca"
which specifically mention horse (asva) and not cow, and asks Agni to cut off the heads of those who eat horse and human meat.

But another verse which speaks about slaughtering bulls as food,

Rig Veda 10.86.14:  uksnó hí me páncadasha sakám pácanti vimshatím, utáhám admi píva íd ubhá kuksí prnanti me v’shvasmad índra úttarah
Translation: Fifteen in number, then, for me a score of bullocks they prepare, and I devour the fat thereof: they fill my belly full with food. Supreme is Indra over all. (Indra eating bulls)

and another on sacrificing ox & cow to Agni,

Rig Veda 8.43.11: uksánnaya vashánnaya sómaprsthaya vedháse stómair vidhemagnáye
Translation: Let us serve Agni with our hymns, Disposer, fed on ox and cow, who bears the Soma on his back.
 
Swami Vivekananda writes in “The complete works of Swami Vivekananda (volume-3 page 174) : 

“There was a time when a Brahmin without eating beef could not remain a Brahmin”. 
(and on page 536)
“You will be astonished if I tell you that, according to the old ceremonials, he is not a good Hindu who does not eat beef. On certain occasions he must sacrifice a bull and eat it.”

Having said all this, it is irrelevant to me whether Hinduism prohibits cow slaughter or not. I am a Hindu who eats beef (it's pretty common over here in Kerala). Hinduism is a pretty inclusive and tolerant religion. My whole family does and I don't think the secular state has any right to tell me not to eat it.

             

Tuesday, 6 October 2015

Photos and photo Captions

 Photo captions are an integral part of newspaper storytelling, but they are often the most underdeveloped element in the mix of words, graphics, and photographs in a newspaper. A poorly executed caption can destroy the message of a photo or the story package of which it is part. The reader/viewer expects nothing less than accurate, complete, and informative information, including captions.
Word Origin and History for caption
 From 17c. used especially in law, and there via its appearance at the headof legal document involving seizure ( "Certificate of caption"etc.), theword's sense was extended to "the beginning of any document;" thus"heading of a chapter or section of an article" (1789), and, especially inU.S., "description or title below an illustration" (1919).

Photo Captions


                  Photo captions are an integral part of newspaper storytelling, but they are often the most underdeveloped element in the mix of words, graphics, and photographs in a newspaper. A poorly executed caption can destroy the message of a photo or the story package of which it is part. The reader/viewer expects nothing less than accurate, complete, and informative information, including captions.
                        
 few suggestions to  writing captions.

  •  Check the facts. Be accurate!
  •  Avoid stating the obvious. “Dennis Rodman smiles as he kicks a broadcast photographer in the groin.”
  •  Always identify the main people in the photograph.
  •  Don’t let cutlines recapitulate information in the head or deck or summary.
  •  Avoid making judgments. “An unhappy citizen watches the protest…” Can you be sure that he is unhappy? Or is he hurting. Or just not photogenic. If you must be judgmental, be sure you seek the truth.
  •  Don’t assume. Ask questions in your effort to inform and be specific. Be willing to contact and include the visual reporter.
  •  Avoid using terms like “is shown, is pictured, and looks on.”
  •  If the photograph is a historic or file photo, include the date that it was taken. Mayor David Dinkins, 1993.
  •  A photograph captures a moment in time. Whenever possible, use present tense. This will creates a sense of immediacy and impact.
  •  Don’t try to be humorous when the picture is not.
  •  Descriptions are very helpful for viewer. The person dressed “in black,” “holding the water hose,” “sulky from chagrin,” or “standing to the left of the sofa, center” are helpful identifying factors. (Photographers must ferret out this kind of material.)
  •  Be willing to allow for longer captions when more information will help the reader/viewer understand the story and situation.
  •  Quotes can be an effective device, be willing to use them when they work.
                      Brindley says photo captioners will interview the photographers and photo editors; they’ll even talk to people in the photo. If the image is of nature or an animal, they will talk to an expert in the field and get information on what is going on in the background.


"   
 A demonstrator throws back a tear gas container after tactical officers broke up a group of bystanders on Chambers Road near W. Florissant Avenue on Wednesday,.... "









" Lately, I’ve noticed the predominance two kinds of images with stories about Ebola — the virus itself and people in hazmat suits. I’ve used both for stories myself and wondered about the tone and message they’re sending.  "













Now it’s over.  Yogi Berra has died at the age of 90.    
He leaves behind a legacy of baseball greatness, and a propensity for the memorable phrase.  Those of us who quote people for a living can learn a lot from old number 8.
I was born into an Italian-American family on the Lower East Side of New York City in 1948, Yogi Berra’s second full season as the catcher of the New York Yankees.  My grandfather, Peter Marino, loved the Yankees, a team with many famous Italian ballplayers: Crosetti, Lazerri, DiMaggio, Rizzuto, and his favorite, Berra.     Next to Mickey Mantle, Yogi became my favorite too.  The first package of baseball cards I purchased with my own money (five cents), Lawrence Peter Berra was the first card in the pack. When my dad took me to Yankee Stadium for the first time in 1958, Yogi hit the game-winning home run.
                                                                                                                                          Hall of Famer Yogi Berra waves before an induction ceremony                                                                                                                                         at the Baseball Hall of Fame in Cooperstown, N.Y., in 2009. 
                                You can look it up.  The statistic that stands out to me is that over 18 seasons Yogi hit 358 home runs, and struck out only 414 times.  (By contrast, one of my favorite players for the Tampa Bay Rays, Carlos Pena, once struck out 182 times in a single season.)
His athletic prowess, his squat stature (perfect for a catcher), and his goofy demeanor, turned him into a New York icon.  If that weren’t enough, he was Mister Malaprop, a public figure whose mangled aphorisms conveyed a kind of folk wisdom.  His most famous include:
  • It ain’t over ‘til it’s over.”
  • “When you come to a fork in the road take it.”
  • “It’s déjà vu all over again.”
Rather than perceive these as redundancies or non sequiturs, the product of an eighth grade education in a working class St. Louis neighborhood, fans accepted them with a smile, happy to see the stab of truth behind them.  Sports Illustrated once wondered whether or not Mr. Berra might not actually be an Eastern mystic, a real yogi, of the type for which he was named.
Because Yogi wore uniform number 8, I will share my eight favorite Yogi-isms now, letting each one inspire some insight into the ways writers capture how people talk:
  1.   “90 percent of the game is half mental.”  Lesson:  Just because someone uses numbers in a quote does not mean that he or she is adhering to mathematical logic. Don’t grab your slide rule.  If the point has been made, let the inconsistencies slide.
  2.    “If you can’t imitate him, don’t copy him.”  Lesson:  There are no true synonyms. Yogi is not being redundant here.  The American Heritage Dictionary makes this distinction between the two key words:  “To imitate is to act like or follow a pattern or style set by another….To copy is to duplicate an original as precisely as possible.”  Yogi was manager of the Mets at the time and told his player Ron Swaboda that he might not have the ability to try to adopt the unusual hitting stance of the great Frank Robinson.
  3.   “I really didn’t say everything I said!”  Lesson: This modest denial should be a reminder for journalists to check out the quote that is too good to be true, to see if it’s apocryphal or carries a false attribution.  Authors such are Ernest Hemingway and Mark Twain are often cited as having said or written things which they never said or wrote. (The reason I am confident that Yogi said these things is that I am getting them from The Yogi Book with the byline Yogi Berra (New York: Workman, 1998).
  4.   “If the world were perfect, it wouldn’t be.”  Lesson: You could argue that Yogi doesn’t know the meaning of perfect.  Or that he has made a wise value judgment.  To use a more common formula:  “Perfect is the enemy of the good.”   It is not patronizing or condescending to argue that common wisdom can be as powerful as and more interesting than the stuff that comes from philosophers and kings.
  5.    “Never answer anonymous letters.”  Lesson: Yogi offers clairvoyant wisdom in anticipation of the digital age.  (Yogi would have been great on Twitter.)
  6.    Yogi was a long time pitch man for the chocolate soft drink called Yoo-Hoo, which I loved as a kid.  At a Yoo-Hoo convention a women asked him, “Is Yoo-Hoo hyphenated?”  Yogi responded, “No ma’am, it isn’t even carbonated.”  Who knew that Yankee catcher was the master of parallelism, ironic juxtaposition, and emphatic word order, where his key word often comes at the end – like a punchline?
  7.    Why buy good luggage?  You only use it when you travel.”  Lesson: Behind such an odd statement, there is usually some evidence to support it. Turns out, Yogi’s teammates made fun of his beat-up luggage, but its bumps and bruises seemed almost built in. “You couldn’t hurt my bags,” he said, “but theirs could only get worse.”
  8.   “I’m as red as a sheet.”  Yogi said this after he flubbed his movie line in a Cary Grant/Doris Day movie “That Touch of Mink.” Lesson:  It always helps to tweak the predictable.  Who would remember this if he said, “I’m red as a beet” or “white as a sheet.”  So did the blood rush to his face or rush from his face?  In essence, Yogi doubles-down on his embarrassment, reminding us that a mash-up need not be a mix-up.
Thanks for the memories, Yogi.  And say hi to my mom.

Monday, 5 October 2015


India is back in “Black Renaissance”


Indian society is actually in the path of renaissance (revival of the past). European renaissance was a glorified thing in history where Indian cultural revivalism is a black mark in the history of India.  
Hindu oriented Modi government force people to go back to the Vedic times. The rigidness of caste practices and the caste based politics which make a rude stratification in the society are evidences for this. The cultural liberalism is declining and forcible religious rigidness with the aim of creating a ‘Hindurashtra’ is in its peak now. Narendra Modi’s image is like a pious believer who initiates bloody sacrifices to satisfy the blood thirst of his god,
The Hindu majority who can Change, Preserve, and destroy his rule. The blood shedding incident took place in Dadri is an example for this. The fundamental question about the value of human life is raised but it is answered with the ‘great’ value of animal’s life.

Thursday, 1 October 2015



[ Dedicated to മരിച്ചുപോയ ചെക്കൻ ]


ഗോ... ദേവത 
''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''''
പണ്ട് പണ്ട് ഹരിയാന എന്നൊരു കൊച്ചു ഗ്രാമത്തിൽ ഒരു പോത്തും ഒരു കുരങ്ങനും ജീവിച്ചിരിപ്പുണ്ടായിരുന്നു, അവരുടെ ബുദ്ധിമുട്ടിയുള്ള ജീവിതവും കഷ്ടപാടും കണ്ട് ദൈവം അവരെ ഒന്ന് സഹായിക്കാൻ തീരുമാനിച്ചു. ദൈവം അവരോട് രണ്ട്പെരോടുമായി ചോദിച്ചു,
നിങ്ങൾക്ക് എന്ത് വരതാനമാണ് ഞാൻ നൽകേണ്ടത്.........?
കുരങ്ങൻ ഉടൻ ചാടി എണീറ്റുകൊണ്ട് പറഞ്ഞു " എനിക്ക് മനുഷ്യനായുള്ള രൂപം നൽകണം എന്ന് . ദൈവം സമ്മതിച്ചു രൂപം നൽകി , അതിനു ശേഷം ദൈവം പോത്തിനോട് ചോദ്യം തുടർന്നു....... പോത്ത് വളരെ കൂടുതൽ നേരം ആലോജിച്ച ശേഷം പറഞ്ഞു " എനിക്ക് ഒരു വരദാനവും വേണ്ട, എന്റെ വരദാനം കൂടി എന്റെ ചെങ്ങായി കുരങ്ങച്ചനു നൽകികൊള്ളു എന്ന് ....
കുരങ്ങച്ചൻ ഉടൻ വീണ്ടും എണീറ്റുകൊണ്ട് പറഞ്ഞു " അങ്ങനെയാണെങ്കിൽ രണ്ടാമത്തെ വരദാനമായി ആ പോത്തിനെ എന്റെ ഇഷ്ട ഭക്ഷണമാക്കാൻ അനുവദിക്കണമെന്ന് " ...........
ഇത് കേട്ടതും പോത്ത് ശുപിതനായി പൊട്ടികരഞ്ഞുകൊണ്ട് ദൈവത്തോട് പറഞ്ഞു " എന്റെ ദൈവമെ ഈ കുരങ്ങൻ ചതിയാണ് കാണിച്ചത്, എനിക്ക് ദയവ് ചെയ്ത് ഒരു വരദാനം കൂടി നൽകണമെന്ന് ".... ദൈവം മാസസ്സില്ല മനസോടെ സമ്മതം മൂളി..... ഉടൻ പോത്ത് പറഞ്ഞു
........ " എന്റെ കൂട്ടത്തിലെ ഏറ്റവും വലിയ പോത്തുകളെ രൂപമാറ്റം വരുത്തി മനുഷ്യരിലേകയക്കണമെന്ന്. ".........
ദൈവം ചിരിച്ചുകൊണ്ട് സമ്മതിച്ചു,
വർഷങ്ങൾക്കിപ്പുറവും ഇന്നും മനുഷ്യർ പോത്തിനെ ആസ്വതിച്ച് കഴിക്കുന്നു,എന്നാൽ ചില വലിയ പോത്തുകൾ പോത്തുകൾക്ക് വേണ്ടി മനുഷ്യരെ കൊല്ലുന്നു........
പോത്തുകൾ ഇനിയും ജനിക്കും,
മനുഷ്യർ പോത്തുകളെ ഇനിയും കഴിക്കും,
വലിയ പോത്തുകൾ ചെറിയ പോത്തുകൾക്ക് വേണ്ടി ഇനിയും മനുഷ്യരെ കൊല്ലുകയും ചെയ്യും......



 ഷഹൽ മലപ്പുറം 
CUH University
Hariyana